The Gospel: Must We Say Jesus Died for ‘You’?

Post image for The Gospel: Must We Say Jesus Died for ‘You’?

A charge laid on Calvinist Christians who hold to particular redemption or limited atonement is that they cannot tell an unbeliever that Jesus died for that particular unbeliever. Aside from the debate on whether Jesus died generally for all, but only atoned particularly for the elect – must Christians say that “Jesus died for you” when sharing the gospel?

My answer is no.

Some object and ask how the gospel can be shared without the particular for you language. Below are two examples of The Father of Modern Missions sharing the gospel without the particular language about Jesus’ death.

I then told them how that God sent his own Son to save sinners; that he came to save them from sin; that he died in the sinner’s stead; and that whosoever believed in him would obtain everlasting life, and would become holy.1

You and I, and all of us are Sinners, and we are in a helpless state but I have good things to tell you. God in the riches of his Mercy became incarnate, in the form of Man. He lived more than thirty years on earth without Sin and was employed in doing good. He gave sight to the Blind, healed the Sick, the lame, the Deaf and the Dumb – and after all died in the stead of Sinners. We deserved the wrath of God, but he endured it. We could make no sufficient atonement for our guilt but he compleatly [sic] made an end of Sin and now he has sent us to tell you that the Work is done and to call you to faith in, and dependence on the Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, leave your vain customs, and false gods, and lay hold of eternal Life through him. After much discourse of this sort we presented him with a copy of Matthew’s Gospel and three more to three other persons. He promised to read and make himself well acquainted with its Contents and then to converse more about it. It was now dark. I, therefore, prayed with them and we returned home.2

Now, just because William Carey was able to share the gospel without saying “Jesus died for you” does not mean it must be shared as such. However, Carey’s examples do answer the question of how a Christian might share the gospel without using particular language about Jesus’ death.

For what it’s worth…

  1. Eustace Carey, Memoir of William Carey, D, D.: Late Missionary to Bengal, Professor of Oriental Languages in the College of Fort William, Calcultta (Hartford: Canfield and Robins, 1837), 180.
  2. Terry G. Carter, ed., The Journal and Selected Letters of William Carey (Macon, Ga.: Smyth & Helwys Pub, 2000), 149.
TwitterFacebookGoogle+PinterestEmailLinkedInRedditStumbleUponbuffer

Related Posts:

  • None

tagged as in Arminianism,Baptist,calvinism,Christian,Christianity,Evangelism,Gospel,Southern Baptist,theology
The above article was posted on July 24, 2012


8 comments
Bita
Bita

I have a question to ponder- why do we have to tone down the severity of our sin? Let me re-phrase it- what is the purpose of eliminating "Jesus died for you" when our sin is that costly? Jesus paid the highest price, his perfect, sinless life for a broken sinful world. He was beaten, mocked, cursed, spit on, made to wear a crown of thorns, carried his own cross, had nails driven through his wrists and ankles, and hung on a cross to die, as the weight of our sin caused his Father to turn his face from him. God is holy. God hates sin. He cannot tolerate sin. There are extreme consequences for sin. If a person cannot see his/ her sin as God the Father sees it, then the cost of it is rather light. Then, you could leave out "Jesus died for you", seeing the price of his life over ours is far less.

acbarberi
acbarberi

The use of the word "Limited" is an unfortunate attempt to make the "5 points" fit into the TULIP acrostic. A better definition of the "Limited Atonement" (the 3rd point) would be something like "Particular Redemption." True, Biblical Calvinists do not believe that Jesus only died for certain people. Biblical Calvinists (I mean, Calvinists that actually read the Bible) believe that Jesus dying on the cross actually redeemed a particular people.

But it is not Biblical to say that Jesus' death & resurrection can only save some people.

But it is Biblical to say that Jesus' death & resurrection actually saved a particular people. In other words, a Calvinist would agree that the elect cannot save themselves. So what did save elect? Jesus dying on the cross and rising again 3 days later actually saved the elect.

Obviously, you can leave out the "Jesus died for you" in your message to the lost, but I think it is entirely appropriate to say, "Jesus desires to see you saved," or something along those lines.

Mark
Mark

Thanks for the comments, folks. I don't see the particular "for you" language in Scripture. The important issue is to explain what Christ did in His death and resurrection and call the unbeliever to repent of their sins and believe in what Christ did for sinners.

Dan Smith (@navychristian)
Dan Smith (@navychristian)

I don't see why you have to have the "for you" language. In my opinion, that is self-seeking anyway. I'm no die-hard Calvanist, and it doesn't really matter if one is or not. If Christ died for the elect, and that person accepts Christ, then that person was part of the elect, so yes, Christ died for them. Still, it doesn't seem necessary. I agree with Courtney.

Jerry
Jerry

"Christ died for sinners. If you repent and place your full trust in him you will receive forgiveness as a result of His death."

That is what I share.

Courtney Hill
Courtney Hill

I agree that it's not necessary to use the phrase "Jesus died for you." John 3:16 doesn't use that phrasing. Whosoever believes in Him shall not perish. Whoever repents and believes will be saved. That is the command of the Gospel. Really, the entire thing hinges on whether or not the person believes that this act of Jesus Christ laying down His life truly applies to them. If so, repent and call out to God for mercy.

In a sense, it can almost be misleading to say to a group of people that Jesus has atoned for all their sins, right? After all, if their sins are all atoned for, why should they DO anything? There is no need. The debt is paid. But the truth is that this atonement is not applicable to the sinner until they repent and believe the Gospel by faith.

Christiane
Christiane

I suppose if you can't tell another human being that Christ died for them, it must be very hard to explain the deep meaning of the Incarnation.

Steve Martin
Steve Martin

Since the cross was the central part of Jesus' mission on earth, it seems to me that it might be a good thing to mention it.

Otherwise, we could stick something else on top of our church buildings...like the Mormons do.

They might as well stick a 'ladder' up there. For all of their self-centered ascendancy projects.

Previous post:

Next post: