<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: John 3:16 Conference, Together for the Gospel and Poor Arguments</title> <atom:link href="http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/</link> <description>Christian, southern baptist, theology, reformed, thinking, culture, religion, apologetics, defense of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 16:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: ABClay</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-5208</link> <dc:creator>ABClay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-5208</guid> <description>I found another &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.one.org/onesabbath/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one&lt;/A&gt;.  I don&#039;t believe that Warren understands what the biggest need that people have truly is.  How can he share the gospel with these people he is trying to help without creating division within this group that he has joined?
Where&#039;s the outcry against Warren joining hands with those who hate God like there is about Ascol&#039;s alleged sharing of communion with our Presbyterian brothers and sisters?
Oh, I forgot...Warren isn&#039;t reformed in his &lt;del&gt;anthology&lt;/del&gt; theology.
Is this hypocritical behavior by the &lt;del&gt;anti-calvinists&lt;/del&gt; non-calvinists in the SBC?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found another <a
HREF="http://www.one.org/onesabbath/" rel="nofollow">one</a>.  I don&#8217;t believe that Warren understands what the biggest need that people have truly is.  How can he share the gospel with these people he is trying to help without creating division within this group that he has joined?</p><p>Where&#8217;s the outcry against Warren joining hands with those who hate God like there is about Ascol&#8217;s alleged sharing of communion with our Presbyterian brothers and sisters?</p><p>Oh, I forgot&#8230;Warren isn&#8217;t reformed in his <del>anthology</del> theology.</p><p>Is this hypocritical behavior by the <del>anti-calvinists</del> non-calvinists in the SBC?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darrin</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4967</link> <dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-4967</guid> <description>Mark, Thanks for bringing this out. To raise a red flag about Baptists and conservative Presbyterians partnering is ridiculous. The unity expressed among the men in T4G has been very encouraging.
Surely the opponents take issue because of doctrine. They don&#039;t care who we join in feeding the hungry, but if our alignments actually address right and wrong interpretations of scripture, watch out.
I just find it ironic that the modern Baptist tendency toward Methodist doctrine is rarely taken issue with, yet this open, respectful joining of reformed believers from two denominations is nearly considered apostasy.
In the Appendix to the Second London Baptist Confession, the writers make it clear that they disagree with their paedobaptist brothers on the subject of baptism, and extensively describe why, yet in the whole confession they are clearly attempting to show their unity in more crucial matters (such as the doctrines of grace).
At the end of the Appendix they state, essentially as Baptists toward Presbyterians, &quot;inasmuch as these things are not of the essence of Christianity, but that we agree in the fundamental doctrines thereof, we do apprehend, there is sufficient ground to lay aside all bitterness and prejudice, and in the spirit of love and meekness to embrace and own each other therein, leaving each other at liberty to perform such other services (wherein we cannot concur) apart unto God, according to the best of our understanding.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Thanks for bringing this out. To raise a red flag about Baptists and conservative Presbyterians partnering is ridiculous. The unity expressed among the men in T4G has been very encouraging.</p><p>Surely the opponents take issue because of doctrine. They don&#8217;t care who we join in feeding the hungry, but if our alignments actually address right and wrong interpretations of scripture, watch out.</p><p>I just find it ironic that the modern Baptist tendency toward Methodist doctrine is rarely taken issue with, yet this open, respectful joining of reformed believers from two denominations is nearly considered apostasy.</p><p>In the Appendix to the Second London Baptist Confession, the writers make it clear that they disagree with their paedobaptist brothers on the subject of baptism, and extensively describe why, yet in the whole confession they are clearly attempting to show their unity in more crucial matters (such as the doctrines of grace).</p><p>At the end of the Appendix they state, essentially as Baptists toward Presbyterians, &#8220;inasmuch as these things are not of the essence of Christianity, but that we agree in the fundamental doctrines thereof, we do apprehend, there is sufficient ground to lay aside all bitterness and prejudice, and in the spirit of love and meekness to embrace and own each other therein, leaving each other at liberty to perform such other services (wherein we cannot concur) apart unto God, according to the best of our understanding.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Twitchell</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4901</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Twitchell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-4901</guid> <description>It makes you wonder, doesn&#039;t AB, that if others were generating as much money and press, would there be any outcry from the ANAL Baptists (Arminian/non-Calvinist/anti-Calvinist/Libertarian Free-will Baptists)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes you wonder, doesn&#8217;t AB, that if others were generating as much money and press, would there be any outcry from the ANAL Baptists (Arminian/non-Calvinist/anti-Calvinist/Libertarian Free-will Baptists)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ABClay</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4860</link> <dc:creator>ABClay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-4860</guid> <description>Rick Warren, to the best of my knowlege (limited as it is) is a southern baptist.
Is there an outcry from the leadership about his &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://watcherslamp.blogspot.com/2008/07/rick-warren-partners-with-pro.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;partnering&lt;/A&gt; , not with other denominations mind you, but with the world.
ABClay</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren, to the best of my knowlege (limited as it is) is a southern baptist.</p><p>Is there an outcry from the leadership about his <a
HREF="http://watcherslamp.blogspot.com/2008/07/rick-warren-partners-with-pro.html" rel="nofollow">partnering</a> , not with other denominations mind you, but with the world.</p><p>ABClay</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4858</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:05:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-4858</guid> <description>Jerry,
I agree.  This is what is seemingly actually being said though it would be denied.
Mark</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry,</p><p>I agree.  This is what is seemingly actually being said though it would be denied.</p><p>Mark</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jerry</title><link>http://hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/comment-page-1/#comment-4845</link> <dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:53:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hereiblog.com/?p=1114#comment-4845</guid> <description>It is not hard to understand, just so long as you understand one simple principle:&quot;If you are against something, one reason is as good as another.&quot;Calvinistic Baptists partnering with non-Baptists is bad because they don&#039;t like Calvinism.&#160; Non-Calvinistic Baptists partnering with non-Baptists is good because they like non-Calvinism.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not hard to understand, just so long as you understand one simple principle:&#8221;If you are against something, one reason is as good as another.&#8221;Calvinistic Baptists partnering with non-Baptists is bad because they don&#8217;t like Calvinism.&nbsp; Non-Calvinistic Baptists partnering with non-Baptists is good because they like non-Calvinism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  hereiblog.com/john-316-conference-together-gospel-poor-arguments/feed/ ) in 0.69059 seconds, on May 22nd, 2012 at 2:37 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2012 at 3:37 pm UTC -->
