Homosexual Activist Agenda: Destroy Marriage

A friend recently pointed me to a radio show on which LGBT rights activist and journalist Masha Gessen was a guest. Gessen, herself a lesbian,  made some interesting admissions about the homosexual agenda. While some may deny that such an agenda exists, she was very clear that those pushing for same-sex marriage lie when they don’t admit that such a marriage would change the institution of marriage. (Thanks to the Illinois Family Institute for the transcript.)

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

As refreshing as it is to find a homosexual rights activist admit the above, all in Gessen’s camp may not agree with her. But she’s right. She correct inferring that same-sex couples will change the institution of marriage once (if) they get there. However, even before they “get there” the institution of marriage would have already changed solely by its re-definition.

What’s next once marriage is destroyed by re-defining it out of its recognizable existence?

tagged as , , , in Christianity,Culture,morality,theology

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Grant June 15, 2015 at 12:48 pm

Yes, the fact that all sharing Gessen’s agenda may not be so honest about it, because they’re hoping to get much further to achieving their agenda before they admit it. Albert Mohler highlighted this on his blog almost two years ago: http://www.albertmohler.com/2013/09/17/can-evangelical-chaplains-serve-god-and-country-the-crisis-arrives/

Before their agenda is achieved, they try to lull Christians/conservatives with nice words. Once they have what they wanted, they couldn’t care less about the rights of Christians. And that’s “what’s next” once marriage has been mutilated in society: silence those who oppose. And, even if no one else will, Christians must oppose by speaking to the enemies of true marriage about making peace with God in Jesus Christ, Whom marriage was created to glorify.


Previous post:

Next post: